Malcontent Blog
When I try to go to the Malcontent's Blog or myvillageblogger etc Avast, which is my virus protector gives me this message. I think they know something!
This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.myvillageblogger.blogspot.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.myvillageblogger.blogspot.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
1 comment:
- David Israel said...
- Hi Grace,Probably, the repugnant nature of the content, name calling and the accusations of non-existent crimes, has triggered violation of use flags, or there may be virus and malware infestation.Heed the waning, it's not worth the risk. (The Great one failed to use his spell checker!)
Dave Israel
Hmmm......................I also use Avast, and so do most of my students. Nobody else (I've checked this out with a goodly number of friends) is getting that message from Avast when logging into this blog, nor Esther's blog. Dave's answer is ridiculous, but it was an opportunity that Grace opened for him to spew more crap from his foaming mouth. He talks about this blog being repugnant, etc. Can someone please explain to me what his blog is if his description of this blog doesn't perfectly fit his own blog? I've read some of the most vile name calling, and other disgusting crap on his blog than I ever read on this blog. I should know, too, because I was the subject for a very long time, and still am occasionally, of his foul mouth and obnoxious lies. What a stupid, contradictory response from a stupid, vile, man. He ought to spend more time worrying about securing this village than he does trying to figure out how to hurt this village. He's done a good job of opening us up to a lot of insecurity instead. Cell phone usage, Vendini, online cameras and the now defunct moveable transponders are a good example of how we've lost security in this village. He'll be leaving a legacy alright when he is no longer the president of UCO, but it won't be the kind he expects nor wants. And...........there will cone a time when he is no longer the president. Of that, I'm sure.
ReplyDeleteGary, so happy to see that you are posting again. As far as that liar goes, this is truly one of his attempts to scare people. He does not want anyone reading the blogs which tell the truth, as opposed to his that rely on lies and misinformation. Hey, the soviets were good at that. Wonder if he learned from them? I am about to answer this nonsense on my blog - more fun!
ReplyDeleteIt's quite easy to see that both Grace and David know nothing about internet safety. Grace's computer seems to be infected. She probably used a wifi connection that was not secure. As for David....is this the person who is being entrusted with our million dollar wifi project!!!!
ReplyDeleteThere are many explanations for Grace's problem, but all of them are her fault.
The fact that David is not embarrassed to make those inane remarks, proves two things.
ReplyDelete1- His stupidity.
2- His belief that the people he's dealing with are equally stupid.
Stupid or gullible, which is it? Or is it apathetic?
ReplyDeleteAnd then, of course, there are some who have stood up and what happened next?
Well, one or two were and still are being either ignored or belittled. Another was taken to task and brought up on charges for recall. Still another was maligned and denied access to ANY CV (read UCO because the residents pay ALL expenses for all buildings, pools, etc.) facility. And it goes on and on.
Where will it stop? When will those who pander to David regain their self-respect and be willing to vote "NO" even tho it might endanger their chairmanships?
I am an observer at this time, but who knows what the future may bring.