On July 3, in the afternoon, after the Delegate Assembly the Security Committee has it's regular meeting at UCO.
One of the items brought up and to be dealt with the fact the the Security Company was NOT living up to the requirements of their Contract.
A discussion was had to send the Security Company a letter that said that we were exercising the 60 cancellation clause.
The vote was 5 for and 4 for sending the letter.
The next day Ed Black notified the Committee that the vote taken and counted on Friday the 3rd was in error it was actually a tie.
Does this sound fishy to you? It does to me!! What's the reason for this suspicious change?
As usual Peter the Bozo put his inane comments on the other blog. If you don't like what is written please don't read it or better yet move as you contribute NOTHING to the village
ReplyDelete101................
ReplyDeleteSubject: PSYCH 101................
****** PSYCH 101: You start with a cage containing four monkeys, and inside the cage you hang a banana on a string, and then you place a set of stairs under the banana. Before long a monkey will go to the stairs and climb toward the banana. You then spray ALL the monkeys with cold water. After a while, another monkey makes an attempt. As soon as he touches the stairs, you spray ALL the monkeys with cold water. Pretty soon, when another monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it Now, put away the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new monkey. The new monkey sees the banana and attempts to climb the stairs. To his shock, ALL of the other monkeys beat the crap out of him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs he will be assaulted. Next, remove another of the original four monkeys, replacing it with
a new
monkey. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment – with enthusiasm -- because he is now part of the "team." Then, replace a third original monkey with a new monkey, followed by the fourth. Every time the newest monkey takes to the stairs, he is attacked. Now, the monkeys that are beating him up have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs. Neither do they know why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey. Having replaced all of the original monkeys, none of the remaining monkeys will have ever been sprayed with cold water.
Nevertheless, not one of the monkeys will try to climb the stairway for the banana. Why, you ask? Because in their minds, that is the way it has always been!
This is how UCO operates, and this is why, from time to time, ALL of the monkeys need to be REPLACED AT THE SAME
TIME!
DISCLAIMER: This is meant as no disrespect to monkeys.
Excellent analogy
ReplyDeleteI am just wondering how a vote by nine people can be a tie?
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't. it was 5 yes to 4 no until the keystone Kops got involved.
ReplyDeleteIt NEVER was a Tie, In the future, the vote count, should be handled by the Sec'try, and not the Chair and as was the case, the Sect'ry was absent, and his substitute, Milt Cohen, was taking the minutes..Ed Black recorded the vote count..which as we have come to learn, was inaccurate, but he did admit that he was against the motion.. How much longer must we endure the antics of those incompetents?
ReplyDeleteSo where does this matter stand?
ReplyDeleteIs Kent to receive a 60 day notice or not?
BetttttieLee asks " How much longer must we endure the antics of those Incompetents?" As long as you do nothing. Like dummies, do nothing. Without Term Limits, you have ruler Israel FOR LIFE and his backroom pal heading up about 6 committees, Black....FOR LIFE. You will also have Vestal FOR LIFE. And, the butt kissers who want to keep their jobs, all FOR LIFE.
ReplyDeleteComplain all you want, but nothing will change, -- not as long as everyone sits on their middle finger and just says "DUH!" And, you talk about outside management....just who do you think would control these outside managers?
Just an observance, BettttieLee, --- whenever you write something detrimental about the UCO President, you never refer to him by name, --- why is that?
EDUARDO
"Why is that?" you ask. Because she plays both sides and she thinks she's good at it.
DeleteTo begin with, my name is Bettie, Lee happens to be my Maiden Name, and Bleckman, my married one...it is not spelled with 4 "T's" Only 2......
DeleteI believe we all are aware of the individual who holds that Office, why give him that honor of putting his name in print Surely not I....Hope that answers your question, Eduardo.....
Until people wake up and realize what these "caring and devoted" people have done to us - and what is more, plan for the future.
ReplyDeleteTo EGAD, Considering we do not know each other, it is rather presumptious of you to assume you know me and how I think, Before you continue to show your ignorance, I strongly suggest you engage in conversation with those that do know me...for I have never been a Player, nor do I intend to become one, at this stage of my life!
ReplyDeleteYou brought it up, my dear. I've engaged in conversation with several lady friends that do know you, and they say you play both sides of the fence all of the time. You did bring it up. Why don't you leave it alone.
DeleteI know it's difficult for you to say anything nice about anybody, but why don't you give it your best shot. Bye, bye, for now.
Hold on now --- let's not get too harsh re Bettie (who has 3 tees in her name, not 5......my mistake).
DeleteI don't think that she plays both sides of the fence. NO, --- she plays the side that appears to be winning. Nothing wrong with that, after all, ---this is Century Village.
EDUARDO