Here is the reply from Israel's lawyer concerning the initiating of actions against M&M Paving for the extremely poor job they did on our roads.
August 12, 2014
Peter M. Feaman
Esq.
3695 W. Boynton
Beach Blvd. Suite 9
Boynton Beach, FL 33436 Re: UCO demand for action Dear Mr. Feaman,
My client United Civic
Organization Inc. has asked me to respond to your August 5th letter which demands
UCO initiate legal action against M&M
Asphalt for alleged construction defects. You make reference to a class action lawsuit filed by Mr. Karpf and Mr. Solomon but a review of the docket
on that lawsuit does not show you as counsel
of record. Your clients are unidentified except for the owner of unit Camden K-245 at Century
Village which I believe is Myron
Solomon.
UCO and its President Dave Israel reject all of Mr. Solomon's allegations and will not initiate any actions against M&M Asphalt or repay any funds to UCO's treasury. Solomon's demands have no legal or factual merit.
Sincerely /
Rod Tennyson Esq.
Rod Tennyson Esq.
This is a copy of the letter that Israel President of UCO had his Attorney send in reply to the demand that a lawsuit be started against M&M Paving by UCO. The reason for this is that the opposition can not go after M&M since they were not a party to the contract. Only M&M and UCO were.
But what is outrageous is that the direction for the action is obviously from the Great David Israel, who is directing Mr. Tennyson. What is simply unbelievable is that this decision has been made only and solely by David Israel.
What happened to the Delegates need to vote on a situation that will affect each and every one of the Unit Holders. That can affect them monetarily. Is it not proper, within the by-laws, new or old, for the President of UCO to ask for a vote and get the pleasure of the Delegates?
This is not the first time the The Great Misdirector (David Israel) had taken it upon himself to take the delegates and by extension the entire population of unit holders down the Garden Path. The first time he spent 5.2 Million Dollars on the roads, now he is about to stand up to a credible lawsuit, without asking direction from the Delegate's Assemble. Incredible!
What happened to the Delegates need to vote on a situation that will affect each and every one of the Unit Holders. That can affect them monetarily. Is it not proper, within the by-laws, new or old, for the President of UCO to ask for a vote and get the pleasure of the Delegates?
This is not the first time the The Great Misdirector (David Israel) had taken it upon himself to take the delegates and by extension the entire population of unit holders down the Garden Path. The first time he spent 5.2 Million Dollars on the roads, now he is about to stand up to a credible lawsuit, without asking direction from the Delegate's Assemble. Incredible!
Below is a Letter from Attorney Feaman to the UCO Insurance Co Attorney.
July 9, 2014
Karen M. Nissen, Esq. Via ertified
Mail & U.S. Mail
Stephanie M. Showe, Esq.
Vernis & Bowling of
Palm Beach, P.A. 884 U.S. Highway One
North Palm Beach, FL
33408
Re: Myron
Solomon and Gerald Karpf vs.
United Civic Organization, Inc. And David
Israel; Circuit Court in and for
Palm Beach County, Florida
Case No. 50 2014 CA 002029
AI
Dear Ms. Nissen and
Ms. Showe:
We will be entering an appearance
in the above-referenced lawsuit.
Pursuant to Section 627.4137 of the
Florida Statutes, please provide our office with the following insurance information in regard
to insurance coverage maintained by the
Defendants, United Civic Organization, Inc.
and David Israel, in regard to the claims filed against
them in this case:
1.
Each
insurer which does or may have provided liability insurance coverage
to pay all or a portion of
any claim which might be made, within 30 days
of the date of this written request,
and a statement, under oath,
of a
corporate officer or the insurer’s claims
manager or superintendent,
setting forth the following information with regard
to each known policy of insurance, including excess or umbrella insurance; and
2.
The name of
the insurer under
each such policy of insurance;
3.
The name of each
insured under each such
policy of insurance;
4.
A statement
of any policy or coverage defense which such insurer
reasonably believes is available to such insurer
at the time of filing such statement;
5.
A copy of
each such policy of insurance. Thank you
for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
PETER M. FEAMAN, P.A.
By:
PMF/mk Peter M. Feaman
cc: Clients
This was answered by Karen Nissen in the affirmative. Meaning she answer all the questions to Feaman's satisfaction.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete