Saturday, June 24, 2017

 We got a letter (actually an Eletter or Email) from the chair of the Advisory Committee notifying us that they wouldn't accept electronic signatures on petitions to amend the bylaws. There's no good reason for their  refusal, the signatures are all verifiable, complete with phone numbers and addresses. Their reaction is not unexpected as we know that any attempt to change things for the better of the residents to the perceived detriment of the administration is going to be met with unreasonable and obstinate obstructionism. 
Here's the letter and our response below

From: "Anita Buchanan" 
To: "olga wolkenstein" , 
To "MARILYN" (Pomerantz) 
(email addresses removed for privacy considerations)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 9:41:34 AM
Subject: Electronic Signatures
Marilyn and Olga,
Sorry, but the Advisory Committee isn't yet ready to accept electronic signatures on petitions. Under the law (see below) all parties have to choose to use electronic signatures), meaning that we'd have to include acceptance of e-signatures in the bylaws so all sides -- party petitioning and party receiving (UCO) -- would be in agreement. Electronic signatures are an idea whose time has come, but we're just a bit ahead of ourselves. We need a bylaw change and can address this at the July 11 meeting.
Here's the explanation: The ESIGN Act is a federal law passed in 2000. It grants legal recognition to electronic signatures and records if all parties to a contract choose to use electronic documents and to sign them electronically. ... No contract, signature, or record shall be denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form.
Attorney language supporting this: "The current electronic petition by the 'Justice for Residents' does not meet the requirements of the Bylaws because the petition must be “signed” by at least 25 members. This means a hand written signature. The Bylaws do not provide for electronic voting or electronic signatures. Ch 718 has provisions for electronic voting but as we know UCO is not a condominium association and thus not subject to Ch 718. "
We want to let you know before you work on other proposals and you might want to redo the one you just submitted for one-vote. Thanks,
Anita Buchanan

Here's our response;
In re: The letter from Anita Buchanan, the chair of the UCO Advisory Committee rejecting E ( electronic) signatures as a legitimate way to propose amendments to the UCO bylaws.
Anita refers to the Esign Act as a basis for denying the use of E signatures as a vehicle for petitioning the UCO administration.
The assertion that the Esign Act prohibits the use of electronic signatures in this instance  is invalid .The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN, Pub.L. 106–229, 114 Stat. 464, enacted June 30, 2000, 15 U.S.C. ch. 96) is a United States federal law passed by the U.S. Congress to facilitate the use of electronic records and electronic signatures in interstate and foreign commerce by ensuring the validity and legal effect of contracts entered into electronically. . Unilaterally generated electronic records and signatures which are not part of a transaction also are not covered by this Act.
The general intent of the ESIGN Act is spelled out in the very first section(101.a), that a contract or signature “may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforcability solely because it is in electronic form”. This simple statement provides that electronic signatures and records are just as good as their paper equivalents, and therefore subject to the same legal scrutiny of authenticity that applies to paper documents.
The Scope of this Act is inherently limited by the fact that it only applies to transactions related to business, commercial (including consumer) and governmental matters. Consequently, transactions with no relation to business, commercial or governmental transactions would not be subject to this Act.The proposing of an amendment to the bylaws of UCO does not fall into the framework covered by the act. The Esign Act is intended to be used as a tool for consumer protection in contracts and transactions and to facilitate commerce. Our petition is a request, not a contract or transaction. 
The further assertion that electronic signatures are not permitted under UCO bylaws is also challenged on the basis that the UCO bylaws do not specifically or in general prohibit Esignatures. The bylaw simply says "signatures" No reference is made in the bylaws to the nature of the signatures other than they must be verifiable.
We challenge the statement that "attorney language" supports the position of the committee. we question the existence of such an opinion and would like to respond to the attorney who stated it, if such an attorney exists,  so that we can challenge his opinion and defend our position. 
For the above stated reasons we respectfully request that the committee reconsider their position on this matter and do the right thing in accepting E signatures as a valid means to make proposals and present petitions to the administration  of Century Village

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Do we need a good, practicing Accountant?

Of course, we do!

To read the latest issue of the CVMessenger - Click here

So what is wrong with D.Israel? He has a practicing, licensed, in Florida and New York Accountant  Can you guess why he will not take advantage of this free volunteer?

It is easy, he, David Israel considers anybody that objects to him as an enemy and is not to be allowed on any committee.

This in line with the Presidents actions. Where he cannot fill the multitude of available jobs.

I think this is flat-out stupid. I don't think this type of action represents the good of the Village.

I don't think this type of attitude should be allowed to fester!

To read the current CVMessenger - Click here


Monday, June 12, 2017

How can you argue against this?

The most momentous political news of the past week? For my money, it wasn’t James Comey’s Senate testimony, riveting as it was. It was the Kansas Legislature’s decision to defy the governor and raise income taxes — a move that could well be the first step in a transformation of American politics much more far-reaching than anything that could come from Russiagate.
Hear me out. Kansas, under Gov. Sam Brownback, has come as close as we’ve ever gotten in the United States to conducting a perfect experiment in supply-side economics. The conservative governor, working with a conservative State Legislature, in the home state of the conservative Koch brothers, took office in 2011 vowing sharp cuts in taxes and state spending, except for education — and promising that those policies would unleash boundless growth.
The taxes were cut, and by a lot. The cumulative cut was forecast to be $3.9 billion by 2019. A fellow at a right-leaning Missouri think tank said in 2015 that Mr. Brownback’s cuts were “the biggest tax cut of any state, relative to the size of its economy, in recent history.”
The cuts came. But the growth never did. As the rest of the country was growing at rates of just above 2 percent, Kansas grew at considerably slower rates, finally hitting just 0.2 percent in 2016. Revenues crashed. Spending was slashed, even on education: In March, the State Supreme Court ruled that state-level school spending was unconstitutionally low. The court is ideologically mixed, but its ruling was unanimous.
Continue reading the main story
The experiment has been a disaster. Mr. Brownback is widely disliked. If he has anything to be grateful for, it’s the existence of Gov. Chris Christie, Republican of New Jersey, who recently swiped from him the title of the nation’s most unpopular governor, which Mr. Brownback had held for the better part of three years.
Finally, even the Republican Kansas Legislature faced reality. Earlier this year it passed tax increases, which the governor vetoed. Last Tuesday, the legislators overrode the veto.
Not only is it a tax increase — it’s even a progressive tax increase! A married couple filing jointly and earning $30,000 will pay an additional $120, which is 0.4 percent of total income, while the same couple earning $100,000 will fork over $755, or 0.755 percent. More than half of the Republicans in both houses voted for the increases.
There’s the background. Now, why is this a big deal?
Because Republicans are not supposed to raise taxes, ever. In Washington or in the states. This goes back to President George H. W. Bush’s agreeing to a bipartisan tax increase in 1990 after famously saying in his 1988 campaign, “Read my lips: no new taxes.” Afterward, the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform, led by Grover Norquist, started making Republican candidates for Congress and state houses sign a no-tax pledge.
Ever since, with scattered exceptions, no Republican member of the House or Senate has voted for a tax increase. For 27 years. If you wonder why problems arise and Congress never does anything about them, the tax pledge is usually the answer, or at least an answer.
Think we need to build bridges and roads and lay freight rail lines? Of course we do. But we can’t. It would require a tax. Think rural Americans need better access to broadband? You bet they do. But doing it right would need a tax. Think we ought to be spending far, far more than we are currently on this hideous opioid crisis, with drug overdoses now being the leading cause of death for Americans under 50? We most surely ought to be. But no — gotta pass those tax cuts.
The Republican no-tax position even bears a share of the blame for our current polarization. Republicans once recognized the principle that public purposes sometimes justified the raising of additional revenue. They might have balked at the specific number the Democrats proposed, but they accepted that taxes were negotiable.
This made compromise possible. The agreement between President Ronald Reagan and Speaker Tip O’Neill in 1983 to save Social Security? It’s a famous deal, among insiders, who point to it often as they lament the lost art of the horse trade. It involved benefits cuts — an increase in future retirement ages — and increases in the payroll tax.
Why can’t they make those kinds of deals today, you ask, for any number of issues? It’s not because there’s something in the water. It’s not because of cable news, or social media or even the corrupting influence of big money in politics. It’s because Republicans won’t agree to a penny in tax increases of any kind — income taxes, payroll taxes, the gasoline tax, anything.
So here’s hoping that Kansas represents a breakthrough moment. The effects of our failure to invest in ourselves are all around us. Change won’t come fast — for one thing, very few Americans know the above, because no one talks about it (hello, Democrats). But at least for now we can say, for the first time in a long time, that something finally isn’t the matter with Kansas.

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Petition

Thanks for your help !

Thanks for helping defeat mandatory Wifi and the increased fees that go with it. We appreciate your signing our  " Just Say No to WIFI" petition . Thankfully the initiative was defeated due to your help and our persistent opposition,


Now we need your help in a new initiative to give each and every unit owner a vote in the election of UCO officers. 
We are presenting a petition to the Advisory Committee to amend the bylaws so that you and all your friends and neighbors in the village have a vote and a say in who represents us.
Though we only need 25 signatures on the petition we would like to present a petition with a lot more names as we feel that it will have a more profound effect on the committee
To add your name to the growing list of residents who agree click on this link and fill out a simple form.


We are also proposing that a new system be adopted that facilitates voting over the internet. though this is not part of our petition we believe it's an idea who's time has come. Becker and Poliakoff, a prominent law firm specializing in HOA and Condominium law is offering an approved system allowing electronic voting over the internet.  Another idea who's time has come !



The Century Village Messenger Club | Century Village, West Palm Beach, FL 33417
Unsubscribe {recipient's email}
Update Profile | About our service provider
Sent by edwardrgrossman@gmail.com in collaboration with

Thursday, June 8, 2017

SELLING US DOWN THE RIVER

We talk about President Donald Trump every day and it's not very nice
the things we say, read and hear, and perhaps the bloody truth.  Some
people might even say, for instance, that he could screw up a two-car
funeral, even if there was one car.  And, even others might say that he
couldn't find his own rear end with two hands and a GPS.  But, I think
that one thing he is trying to do is clean up the Washington Old Buddy's
Club.  It's all about money, money and money, -- and power, power and
more power, with egos built in.

Let's just throw out one true story of how the Old Buddy's Club works,
and because of money and power, nobody dares talk about it.  How the
Iranians got their nuclear deal.  Very interesting......did you ever wonder
how the Iranians got their nuclear deal from Obama via Secretary of
State John Kerry?  Well, look who is married to John Kerry's daughter.
Who knew?  Surprise!  Did you see anything in the news media regarding
this?  In 2009, the daughter of Secretary of State John Kerry (Dr. Vanessa
Bradford Kerry), married an Iranian physician named Dr. Brian Vale Nahed.
No mainstream media reported this.  Guess who was the best man at the
wedding?  None other than Mohammed Javad Zarif.  Who is Zarif?  He
is current minister of foreign affairs for Iran.  He was Kerry's chief
counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations.  So, Kerry was dealing with
his daughter's father-in-law.  Cozy 'eh?

Can you say "conflict of interest" and "breach of national security" and
"aiding and abetting" one of our principal National Enemies?

Please share this, while noting how the media seems to have withheld
this rather significant news from the American people.  Try this on, ----
keep the story, but switch the Kerry/Trump names and you'd have every-
one in Washington wanting to take trump out back and set him afire, and
the media would have enough hot news for the next couple of years.

Trump is too incompetent to understand his own incompetence, but he is
sure shaking the tree pretty hard to try and get the politicians with umpteen
millions and power to listen to the American people.  Interestingly enough,
Obama knew about Kerry and so did Clinton......members of the Washington
Old Buddy's Club, with secrecy fences higher than the one Trump wants to
build.  450 billion dollars down the tubes and false promises.

Poor Trump, -- if he wasn't so ill-informed about his own policies, and if he
didn't trample on his own talking points, he might turn out to be just a skosh
better than corrupt Nixon.  But, Trump is not a member of the Washington
Old Buddy's Club; he's a self-appointed President of the Big Business
Authoritarian Club.

Now, just think if Senator John Kerry was successful in his run for President.
The Iranians would have everyone here speaking Farsi and all men with
their heads on the floor sniffing like hound dogs and praying three times a
day to Allah.  And, if Hillary Clinton was elected President,.....I don't even
want to go there..... it's too shameful.

If Trump could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of his
troubles, he wouldn't sit for a week.  He needs to join the Club of which
Kerry belonged where everybody with money and power protect everyone
else with money and power no matter what.  And, if a politician talks about
it with evil intent,  --  he is forever shunned.

So, simply put, Kerry becomes family to Iran and sells us down the river,
and Obama (a Club member), has to agree with Kerry for moronic reasons,
but that scenario becomes complex because the Kerry/Obama/Iran picture
cannot include Israel.  Thus, Obama's stance toward Israel is devastating.

Don't you just love America?

EDWARD J.ROSS



Tuesday, June 6, 2017

A bridge to Hawaii

Sadness, sadness, it appears, seems to be everywhere these days.
Everybody has varying degrees of sadness, from the bombings in
London to who is really the leader of this country, to wondering if 
if global warming is going to put CV under water,  even to what a
mean dictator has  done to this one-time very happy place to retire
knowing that your modest social security check would suffice.
Well, look in the mirror tomorrow morning and if your image smiles
back at you, then you know this day is going to be a good one.  Let's
see if this innocent little funny can show a bunch of your teeth,
real or false.

   A man was walking along a Californian beach and stumbled
   across an old lamp.  He picked it up and rubbed it and out
   popped a genie.

   The genie said "OK, OK.  You released me from the lamp,
   blah blah blah.  This is the fourth time this month and I'm
   getting a little sick of these wishes so you can forget about three
.  You only get one wish!"

   The man sat and thought about it for a while and said, I've always                
   wanted to go to Hawaii but I'm scared to fly and I get very
   seasick.  Could you build me a bridge to Hawaii so I can
   drive over there to visit?"  

   The genie laughed and said, "That's impossible.  Think of
   the logistics of that!  How would the supports ever reach
   bottom of the Pacific?  Think of how much concrete...how
   much steel!!   No - think of another wish."

   The man agreed and tried to think of a really good wish.
   Finally, he said,  "I've been married and divorced four times.
   My wives always said that I don't care that I'm insensitive.
   So, I wish that I could understand women....know how they
   feel inside and what they're thinking when they give me the
   silent treatment....know why they're crying, know what they
   really want when they say 'nothing'....know how to make
   them truly happy...."

   The genie said,  "YOU WANT THAT BRIDGE TO BE
   TWO  LANES OR FOUR?"

   ED ROSS


Tuesday, May 30, 2017

March Meeting

During the March Meeting of the Reporter, I asked for an update on the Financial Situation...in particular Accounts Receivable, whether there was any Past Due Accounts..The response I received was that in fact there was,uncollected funds..no further details were provided.
 Subsequently I e mailed Joy Vestal as Co Editor & VP, initially received no response. I then contacted the late Howard O'Brien, who passed my request along to Myron Silverman.. I followed up with e mail confirming our conversation ( Howard & I) shortly thereafter I heard from Joy, suggesting I make an appointment during business hours to discuss this matter...I responded I am not able to do so, and secondly no discussion is necessary..Provide me with the figures and the length of time these accounts are Past due...I still have not  received a response..
As you all may know, it is mandated in the UCO by laws, we have a Village News Paper, that we as owner's are financially responsible for and therefore have the right to question the financial status..
It has been the practice to have all ads accompanied by payment ( Cheque, Cash and for a short period of time credit card, which is no longer available) therefore eliminating any Past Due Accounts...
The only conclusion I can draw is that those currently in charge are incompetent.....
I strongly suggest my fellow owner's make the same request, whether it be via e mail or at the upcoming Reporter meeting...April 7th at 1 pm in the UCO Board room...
Thank you.

Bettie Lee Bleckman

Monday, May 29, 2017

Phone call rejected

Kindly post the following to alert our Resident's...Thank you...

Earlier today, I received a phone call from 984-333-1396, claiming they represented "Medicare" They had my name, and wanted me to confirm my medical condition ( whether or not I had back pain etc.) I declined, however, the male on the other end insisted I could get a "brace for free" to which I responded "Nothing is Free" and did not appreciate his attempt to Scam the unsuspecting public...I did make contact with my Insurance care provider, and they knew nothing of the sort.
Of course, my curiosity got the better of me, and I called the above # only to find a recording, "Call Rejected" On another note, another telephone # appeared on my caller ID 561-121-9364, which stated it was an Invalid #...( didn't answer that one) ...We know there are countless other's out there, attempting to defraud us... Please bear this in mind....

Bettie Lee Bleckman

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Thursday, May 25, 2017

The biggest Liar

DAVID ISRAEL HAS TO BE THE BIGGEST LIAR ON THIS EARTH AND THE FOOL LANNY HOWE STANDS BY HIM LIKE AN IDIOT PUPPET.
Read David’s lying blog:
David loves to twist words. It was never said AT&T was bidding on bulk. WE SAID AT&T WAS INSTALLING FIBER-OPTIC CABLE BECAUSE THEY INTEND TO OFFER IT TO INDIVIDUAL ASSOCIATIONS IN DEVELOPMENTS –in the future of course.
David continues on his BLOG-BLOG to say there was nothing hush-hush about it.
Well, I had to dig under a pile of garbage to find someone who knew about it. If it wasn’t hush-hush, why didn’t David mention it to the delegates?
Lanny Howe goes on to say we attack David. Of course we do. Do you want another Road Paving imbroglio?




Wednesday, May 24, 2017

More Misinformation

MORE MISINFORMATION FROM DAVID ISRAEL.
David Israel stated on his blog that AT&T was not offering bulk video to the village. If he read my posting correctly, he would have known I did not say that it WAS offering it to OUR Associations.   I said: AT&T is offering BULK services to individual associations – they have done this in other developments. I did NOT say they were offering it to OUR associations. I simply said they were offering it to Associations – they have done this in other developments.
 I also stated in my “Breaking News” posting that NorthSky  already installed Fiber-Optics in some buildings, which were told to us by the individuals doing the survey to correct the problems with the installation in some of the buildings.

What is so secret about this installation?  Does this have any connection to Atlantic Broadband? We have a right to know all the facts before we vote. We do not want another Roadway Paving fiasco. 

Fridays Vote

Our President, Dave Israel, is heading us into a quagmire. A quagmire that is going to to be hard to extricate ourselves from. He is unaccountably pushing for a multi-million dollar investment in communications for the entire village. I said multi-million dollar investment without a full and complete debate by the complete Village.

It is wrong for Israel to force his attitude on us without a  full and complete Village wide debate. This is too big a deal to do otherwise.

The question is why is he doing that?

But besides that, we must advise our Delegates to vote against this and follow the debate. Our Delegates should not be rushed into a this10-year contract.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

BREAKING NEWS
We have an update on AT&T’s proposed fiber-optics installation in the village. It now appears that AT&T has already installed fiber-optics in some of the buildings. NorthSky Communications was having problems in the installation in some buildings – the survey was to solve some of the problems.
The installation was NOT news to UCO, yet was kept hush-hush. Why, was David Israel pushing Atlantic broadband stating they needed two years to install fiber-optics when he knew that AT&T was already doing it? Why was this kept secret?  Why is David in such a great hurry to sign a contract?

The residents deserve an answer to these and many more questions.

P.S. Read the comments about the Atlantic Broadband Contract – it smells of rotten fish.  
AN URGENT LETTER TO ALL OFFICERS, AND EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS OF UCO.
It has just come under our attention that NorthSky Communications has at this moment completed a survey for AT&T to install Fiber-Optic  Wiring to our village at NO COST TO US. We were also informed that AT&T will offer Bulk Service to individual associations; they have done this in other developments.
Regarding this new development, it is imperative that we do not rush into any contract with Atlantic Broadband. There are too many questions that need to be answered before we commit to a 10-year contract. I beg every Officer and executive board member of UCO to make a motion to postpone the cable vote until we have more information. If you do not do this, and we do not have a quorum, we will be chained to Atlantic Broadband for ten years.
YOU MUST REMEMBER; YOU ARE IN OFFICE TO REPRESENT THE RESIDENTS, NOT
SPECIAL INTERESTS.
Olga Wolkenstein
The Century Village Messenger Club


Saturday, May 6, 2017


WARNING TO ALL RESIDENTS

The UCO advisory committee is changing our bylaws.

David Israel is violating our bylaws by attempting to control all proposed changes.  

Please read the letter to our UCO attorney.

Olga Wolkenstein
361 Northampton R
West Palm Beach, Fl 33417
                                                                                                May 6, 2017
 
Rod Tennyson Pa, Attorney
1450 Centrepark  Blvd
#100
West Palm Beach Fl 33401
 
 
Dear Mr. Tennyson,
The advisory committee in Century Village WPB is in the process of revising the UCO bylaws. At a meeting of the advisory committee, I submitted a number of suggestions for the advisory committee to consider. David Israel, president of UCO refused consideration of my suggestions stating according to the UCO bylaws, I needed a petition of 25 signatures for each suggestion. According to the UCO bylaws - copy enclosed - Mr. Israel was in error. I was not proposing any change in the bylaws, I was merely offering suggestions to the committee to consider.   Our Bylaws clearly state that any bylaw PROPOSAL must be given to the advisory committee with a petition. My SUGGESTIONS were not PROPOSALS to change the bylaws; they were only suggestions to the committee to consider. With this in mind, I would like you to inform Mr. Israel that he was in error and must allow the advisory committee to consider my suggestions.
Please send me a copy of the letter.
Sincerely,
 
Olga Wolkenstein, President
Northampton R Association
 

Thursday, May 4, 2017


READ THIS BEFORE YOU VOTE FOR CABLE.
Something you must know before you vote for cable.
Comcast gives us “ON DEMAND” free.   ON DEMAND allows us to see free movies and missed programs.  
I asked David Israel, whether we will have ON DEMAND if we choose Atlantic Broadband, he said “YES” we will have it through TiVo - BIG PROBLEM. In order to get TiVo you must have Internet Service with  Atlantic Broadband which is an additional $20.00.  Therefore, if you choose Atlantic Broadband, you will have to pay  $20.00 extra to enjoy ON DEMAND.  Many of you do not have a computer and do not have a need for the Internet. So, why pay $20.00 for something you now get free with Comcast.
THINK HARD, BEFORE YOU VOTE THIS FRIDAY.

Monday, April 10, 2017


URGENT NOTICE TO ALL RESIDENTS:

I have received an additional bylaw suggestion from a resident which gave me a wonderful idea.  Any bylaw change you would like to see, please put it under COMMENTS below this notice  and I will include it with my list of suggestion changes. If you would like credit for your suggestion, please include your name. If not, just sign anonymous.

Thank you for your help.

Sunday, April 9, 2017


UCO’S PROPOSED BYLAW CHANGES WILL HAVE A PROFOUND EFFECT ON YOUR PEACE OF MIND.  
Under The administration of David Israel, the UCO bylaws will be changed to keep the power in the hands of a few rather than the majority. A few examples of excessive power by the presidents are:
The following has been eliminated:
A DELEGATE OR SEATED ALTERNATE DELEGATE MAY BE REMOVED OR SUSPENDED FROM PARTICIPATION AT ANY GIVEN MEETING BY A VOTE OF TWO THIRDS (2/3 OF THE DELEGATES PRESENT.
This change now means that David Israel or any President will have the power to remove anyone from any meeting for no apparent reason – simply because he may not like them.
Another example is the Board of Directors (which means YOU) will lose the power to hire all personal and third party managements, maintenance, repair, and operation on the property. Under the new bylaw change, the Board will only have the power to APPROVE, not hire. 
There are many more bylaw changes being considered that will NOT benefit the residents.  At this time, I would like to add my two cents and give you some of my Bylaw suggestions, which I feel will benefit the residents and maintain a balanced rule.  
 
OLGA’S  BYLAW SUGGESTIONS
 
  1. One vote in UCO elections for all resident unit owners.  One vote per unit.
  2. No President or officer shall use their personal website for any UCO business.
  3. Establish a UCO website for informational purpose only.
  4.  2 – 2-year term limits for all UCO officers and executive board members.
  5. No President, or officer of UCO shall sign any contract, budgeted or not over $1,000 without delegate approval.
  6.   In the event of an emergency, a special meeting of the delegates may be called with notices in the clubhouse, website and channel 63 and 95. If a quorum is not present, the majority vote prevails.
  7. Officers shall not vote on more than two committees. All committees shall be limited to two votes by any officer.
     
  8. When a president violates a bylaw and is given written notice of said violation, he must correct the violation within 7 days. If a president violates three bylaws without correcting said violation, he is subject to removal of office by a majority vote of the delegate assembly.  
     
  9. No resident of Century Village shall be a paid employee of UCO.
  10. A forum shall be held each year for all candidates running in the UCO election.
  11. The chair of a committee shall be the sole person authorized to remove a member of his/her committee.
  12. A sitting President shall not have the authority to arbitrarily remove the chair of any committee without just cause.
  13. The UCO Reporter, shall be available to all residents within the guidelines of a professional news organization.  It shall contain an op-ed column.
14. The Century Village Blog, channel 63 and 95 shall be available to all residents within the guidelines of established rules.
15. Information submitted by various clubs shall be made available to the residents at each delegate assembly.
16. The position of ombudsman shall be restored
17. All committee meetings shall be videotaped or recorded.
18. All committee members and their votes on any issue shall be published in the UCO Reporter. 
19, The bid committee shall be included in the list of UCO committees.
20. Clarify procedures for removal of officers.
21. With the exception of emergencies, a quorum must be available for any motion to be passed when presented by the executive board.
22.  UCO may hold weekly staff meetings which shall be limited to the volunteer
staff and officers. Discussion shall be limited to the operation of the UCO office. Voting of any business outside the parameters of the UCO office is prohibited.