The comment

Elaine Brown of UCO fame and of fortune says: "If you have a brand new idea for the village, please DO NOT bring it untested to the Delegate Assembly. Go to UCO where there is a great experience base and the historical reachable database, most ideas are not new. When the idea is properly organised the UCO system will move the idea/plan to the Assembly. Then maybe we can finish on time. Also spare us from historical regurgitation and whining, we understand some people have unique sensitivities but we should not waste the time of hundreds of residents."

So what she is saying is that there are no new ideas. Everything has been thought of before and it is old News. You, the idea people must bring all your ideas before UCO, not before the Delegates and, let me say that again, you must have UCO approval before you bring it to the Assembly. What happens if The Great One doesn't like it? What if Elaine Brown doesn't like it?

This is putting the cart before the Horse. Again. Why or where in the changeable By-Laws does it say UCO must approve all new ideas. Where does it say UCO has the right of first refusal? Where does it say that UCO is in charge and by extension, David Israel is in charge!

I think that the Lies that David Israel presents to the Delegates should be recognized for what they are, self serving  lies presented to the Delegates to advanced Israels agenda. Wi-Fi, Volunteers, Committee Membership, Budgets, etc.

I refer you to my 10 Complaints about The Great and Wise Wizard Who lives in OZLAND. He and now his Minion Elaine Brown feel that anything new has to be cleared by UCO. Do they have it backwards or what? The original setup was that the Delegates were the Bosses and UCO was secondary and worked for the Assembly. Now they have turned it all around.

Unbelievable!

Let's get rid of this Bully, Term Limit him, Recall him, Vote him out