Monday, February 24, 2014

$40,000 Transfer from the Reporter


See "Transfer from Reporter $40,000" above


Imagine my surprise just the other day, when I was asked about $40,000 that had been “transferred” from the Reporter funds into the UCO General Fund.  The implication being that this was done “in the dark” and “was probably illegal”.  How unfortunate it is that some people have nothing more constructive to do with their time than attempt to start unfounded rumors in an attempt to besmirch a person’s character and integrity.  Before making statements of this nature perhaps an inquiry should be made in order to ascertain what actually occurred.


The facts are as follows:

 

This was discussed at the regular monthly open Editorial meeting of the Reporter staff in the summer of 2009 as the budget for 2010 was then in the planning stages.  It was agreed by all present at that time that this was “surplus money” – earned by the staff of The Reporter and there was no objection to moving this sum to the General account in order to reduce payments from the unit owners.  The minutes of this meeting are not available as the paper documents do not seem to exist any longer and I have been denied access to “The Cloud” for the last several months. 


Myron Silverman, one of the current co-editors of The Reporter, was present at that meeting, and as a matter of fact responded to a recent inquiry on this very topic that he did indeed remember what I have described to you.  To further substantiate the validity of this transfer, please refer to the above document excerpted from the UCO Budget for 2010 as adopted by the Delegates on October 2, 2009.  In particular, I call your attention to the line titled “Transfer from Reporter - $40,000”.

 

Dorothy Tetro

4 comments:

  1. My posting refers to the document BELOW. Please note - this document is at the very top.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dorothy, it is always a pleasure to read your postings as they are quite clear and to the point. It is unfortunate indeed that you must spend the time of combating this technique of lies and attempted coverups. I thank you for all your hard work that you have dedicated to the residents of the Village.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who. What, Why, Where are the axioms of good reporting.

    Your article is lacking the following in order to make reading worthwhile.
    :
    1) Who made the allegation your referring to.
    2) What is the importance of the allegation to the village as a whole at this time,David's actions showed the Village his fear of letting the delegates vote. People trust you.
    3) Why was it said is pure conjecture on your part without the reader knowing all the facts.
    4) Where was it said, in public (how many people were there) in private?

    Answers to these questions would serve you and the village better and should be included in any future articles that pertain to the past
    Your future reporting should be focused on who you support in the upcoming election in order to change the VILLAGE FOR THE BETTER ..

    INQUIRING MIND c;luck-cluck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Inquiring Mind - thank you for the constructive criticism.
      I will keep this in mind for future postings.

      Delete