Malcontents denied, again!

So reading Dorothy's post about the use of Robert's Rules, why does the great Wizard of  UCO deny it. Why does he take it upon himself to decide when and where Robert's Rules apply?

He claims we are not the British Parliament, and he is right we are not. But we are a body politic and governed by rules. One of them being  Robert's Rules.

So we get back to the question how or why does Mr. Israel find it necessary to deny the Delegates Assembly the right to be governed by Robert's rules. Or does this denial only apply to Malcontents?

Stupid isn't it?

Rethinking the Performance of Israel at the last DA meeting I am aghast at his childessness, at his boorishness, at his hutzpah to repeat "sit down, sit down, sit down, sit down ..." or "you are at of order, you are out of order, you are out of order ,,,," ad infinitum.

Dumber still.