The kelly Lawsuit

What I don't understand about the Kelly Lawsuit is why UCO is not a part of it. It seems to me that UCO was established as a buffer and advisor for the Condos. WE give it a lot of money to do things that we could do our selves, but are better done as one entity. Below is a partial list of the grievances that Sheffield O has against kelly.

To see the whole lawsuit rather than a synopsis written by the little dictator follow the link to the Kelly Homeless Hotel

 A.     Canceling the prohibition on apartment owners from leasing or renting

their apartments more than once during a period of their ownership for a maximum of one (1)

year. In lieu thereof, Kelly purports to allow wholesale leasing of the apartment units for any term and for multiple terms within any one (1) year period;

B.              Kelly purports to delete from the condominium covenants Use and Occupancy Requirements, i.e., that an owner of a unit shall occupy and use his apartment unit as a single family private dwelling, for himself and for the adult members of his family, and his social guests and for no other purpose. Thus, Kelly purports to rent his units to anyone, anytime with virtually no limitation.

C.              Kelly purports to delete from the Use and Occupancy provisions of the condominium covenants, the age limitation, i.e., no person under the age of fifty-five (55) years of age shall be permitted to reside in any of the units or rooms thereof in the condominium, except that children under the age of fifteen (15) may be permitted to visit and temporarily reside for reasonable periods not in excess of 30 days in any calendar year. In doing so, Kelly purports to open up the condominium to any age and for any period of time;

D.              Kelly purports to delete from the Use and Occupancy Section of the condominium covenants the limitation regarding the maintaining of animals within the condominium units and, in lieu, Kelly purports to include a weight restriction only;

B.    Kelly purports to delete from the ByLaws of the Sheffield 0

Condominium Association the limitation that requires three fourths (3/4ths) of the condominium unit owner in order to amend the ByLaws and, in lieu thereof, Kelly purports to allow for a simple majority';

F.               Kelly purports to delete from the ByLaws a requirement that the Lessor under the Long Term Lease must provide written approval. In doing so, Kelly purports to deny Long Term Lessor's legal rights fundamental to the Long Term Lease;

G.              Kelly purports to add an insurance requirement upon each individual unit owner which did not previously exist; and

H.              Kelly purports to include other deletions and additions to the condominium covenants and ByLaws.