BELIEVE IT OR NOT
Lanny Howe wrote on David’s
blog that he did not know exactly
WHAT one vote per unit meant.
Well Lanny, now that you have awoken from your extended snooze, I will explain it to you.
Once a year the delegates go to the clubhouse to vote for UCO officials, i.e., President, Vice President and Executive board members. The ONE-VOTE intended change is to allow not only the delegates to vote for UCO officials but for each unit to have a vote; allowing only ONE VOTE to multiple unit owners.
You go on to ask, might it extend to vote on certain important issues? I thank you for opening up this Pandora box. You have just given the residents of the village a tremendous opportunity to debate this important question. I repeat, should RESIDENTS who seldom if ever attend meetings and have little or no knowledge of what’s going on be allowed to decide our future?
Yes, because 125 DELEGATES voted in the UCO elections never attended any delegate assembly meetings, therefore, every unit owner, whether they have the knowledge or not should also have the right to have a say in all issues of importance and to how UCO spends their money.
You parallel our forefathers making the decision to have an Electoral College because they questioned whether the average person was sufficiently informed and possessed of good judgment to make a wise choice. Our forefathers decided on the Electoral College but still gave each citizen the right to vote, and we should do the same. GIVE EACH UNIT OWNER THE RIGHT TO ONE VOTE.
You suggest that improved communications may perhaps make our unit owners better educated in village affairs, and maybe the blog would be a good forum for hashing it out? Who’s blog, David or Gary’s?
THE SO CALLED “OUR VILLAGE BLOG” IS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY DAVID ISRAEL; "THE UCO REPORTER” REFUSES TO PRINT ARTICLES AND LETTERS TO THE EDITOR BY ANYONE WHO OPPOSES DAVID ISRAEL; "CHANNEL 63” HAS BARRED THE MESSENGER CLUB FROM ADVERTISING THEIR MEETINGS; "WPRF" REFUSES TO POST THE NOTICE OF MESSENGER CLUB MEETINGS IN THE LOBBY AND HAS STOPPED ALL ELECTIONEERING AT THE POOLS.
How can this lack of opposing information give the residents the ability to vote sensibly? It can’t. Go back to sleep Lanny and wake up in the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY you are way behind the times.
Well Lanny, now that you have awoken from your extended snooze, I will explain it to you.
Once a year the delegates go to the clubhouse to vote for UCO officials, i.e., President, Vice President and Executive board members. The ONE-VOTE intended change is to allow not only the delegates to vote for UCO officials but for each unit to have a vote; allowing only ONE VOTE to multiple unit owners.
You go on to ask, might it extend to vote on certain important issues? I thank you for opening up this Pandora box. You have just given the residents of the village a tremendous opportunity to debate this important question. I repeat, should RESIDENTS who seldom if ever attend meetings and have little or no knowledge of what’s going on be allowed to decide our future?
Yes, because 125 DELEGATES voted in the UCO elections never attended any delegate assembly meetings, therefore, every unit owner, whether they have the knowledge or not should also have the right to have a say in all issues of importance and to how UCO spends their money.
You parallel our forefathers making the decision to have an Electoral College because they questioned whether the average person was sufficiently informed and possessed of good judgment to make a wise choice. Our forefathers decided on the Electoral College but still gave each citizen the right to vote, and we should do the same. GIVE EACH UNIT OWNER THE RIGHT TO ONE VOTE.
You suggest that improved communications may perhaps make our unit owners better educated in village affairs, and maybe the blog would be a good forum for hashing it out? Who’s blog, David or Gary’s?
THE SO CALLED “OUR VILLAGE BLOG” IS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY DAVID ISRAEL; "THE UCO REPORTER” REFUSES TO PRINT ARTICLES AND LETTERS TO THE EDITOR BY ANYONE WHO OPPOSES DAVID ISRAEL; "CHANNEL 63” HAS BARRED THE MESSENGER CLUB FROM ADVERTISING THEIR MEETINGS; "WPRF" REFUSES TO POST THE NOTICE OF MESSENGER CLUB MEETINGS IN THE LOBBY AND HAS STOPPED ALL ELECTIONEERING AT THE POOLS.
How can this lack of opposing information give the residents the ability to vote sensibly? It can’t. Go back to sleep Lanny and wake up in the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY you are way behind the times.
No comments:
Post a Comment