Injustice from the Justice

THE INJUSTICE OF ANTONIN SCALIA

According to Justice Scalia, it is perfectly justifiable  to use MORAL DISAPPROVAL as a valid reason to interpret the constitution. He uses this reasoning to deny gays the same marriage rights as heterosexuals.  Justice Scalia is a devout Catholic, and has a PERSONAL moral right to frown upon gay marriage. However, he was also sworn to uphold the constitution, the separation of church and state and rights of all citizens. Morality, like the law is open to interpretation. What may be morally offensive to one religion may be a slap on the wrist in the Catholic Church - such as turning a blind eye to pedophile priests who abuse young boys?  In Scalia’s eyes, it appears to be suitable for a priest to take advantage of children, while it is not for two adult same-sex couples to marry with equal rights as heterosexuals.    Justice Scalia’s logic of MORAL DISAPPROVAL to deny gays the same rights as heterosexuals is a poor excuse for him to be discriminate against gays. He would better serve the public if he used his MORAL DISAPPROVAL to be discriminate against pedophiles.  Instead, he swears allegiance to the Catholic Church the very institution that throws pedophiles into the arms of children. In Scalia’s eyes, it is acceptable for the Catholic Church to hide behind the mask of MORAL DISAPPROVAL but not homosexuals.