Dave, you maintain ownership of your blog, both one and two. YOU ALONE make the decision to allow a comment on the blog or not and please do not deny that as it is common knowledge and you have banned so many. Your story of not having enough room for more bloggers is a sack of garbage as the supposed second extension blog has the same ninnies talking to each other. So now we come to the issue.
How could you have allowed that nutjob nutmeg to post such a statement and even if we are lenient with you and it slipped by, though how it could have I don't know, WHY DID YOU NOT REMOVE IT? WHY DO YOU NOT DISAVOW IT?
So the question arises - do you, Dave Israel, the current president of UCO and running again for election, stand by what you allow one of your backers to post on the blog? Do you agree with her statement that I will turn the Village into a ghetto? And if you do, then another question arises. I rushed to judgment and assumed one type of ghetto, but perhaps this nutjob is an all inclusive hatemonger. Perhaps we should include the Latino barrio and of course, the prime example and onset of the term ghetto - the Jewish ghetto. Perhaps she subscribes to Herr Hitler's philosophy or the Aryan Brotherhood? Perhaps she is an all purpose hater.Really, Dave, is that what you are underneath that techie outer covering? Do you stand by her venomous accusation? And if so, is that who we, the residents of the Village, with its wonderful diversity and enrichment and sharing of cultures and backgrounds want as president? Or would they prefer one who was accused BY a racsist?
J'accuse, Mr. Israel, J'ACCUSE! WE, the residents of Century Village, await your disavowal and get the campaign back to the issues of money and budget, process, future planning, financial stability, goals, and on and on. Put away the hatred that your follower has brought up and reassure the people that you do not subscribe to this. The challenge is there. Rise to it.
It was Mr. Israel's blog that started all the chaos in Century Village. When he took office, his first order of the day was to shut down Carole's Q&A which belonged to the Village. Soon after he started his viciousness on his blog and began calling anyone who disagreed with him a malcontent. This is Mr. Israel's mantra. This is one of the many reasons he must be removed from office and from what I see at the Delegates meeting this is going to happen. The only problem now is getting these officers who stand steadfast by his side to see the light.
ReplyDeleteMr. Israel and his kind are responsible for all the hate mongering that is going on and I include racist attitudes. It is his group that keeps repeating, the people who are coming into the village are lowering the standards. . Who are the people they are talking about? Are they black, Latino, French, Jews, Italians, Irish, or poor?
The bottom line is these questions awaken our prejudices and it is dangerous for Mr. Israel and his gang to keep bringing it up.
Que Sera Sera. Life evolves.
I'm glad you called it Frau Carole's Q&A , as Frau Carole herself said ," it was a place for people to find a plumber or a wedding hall"..CV matters of state were off limits to anyone who wished to question how Lord Lowenstien or any of his deciples ran the Village. Frau Carole routinely banned people from commenting on topical CV issues like Insurance, UCO By Laws or Millenium Agreement,etc.. Due to Frau Carole's iron fisted control of the Q&A, reminiscent of a Fascist Regime, Dave's Blog became the CV information highway. Little wonder in a free society.!
DeleteAll of these problems or opportunities are alleviated by commenting and posting on this blog. The only requirement is be Civil and stay on Message. Liberty Vance
DeleteAt least people are beginning to catch on to the truth. I believe that Dave and cohorts are beginning to run scard as delegates and committee members refuse to obey his commands. We must keep pressing, questioning and demanding answers and explanations
ReplyDeleteMike, I have a copy of the letters sent to each of the people who were banned from the Q&A. To be exact, there were 3 people banned, and each received 3 letters asking them to refrain from their actions before being removed. and you were one of them. NONE were ever banned for questioning what you mentioned. You were a sick uneducated puppy then, and you're still a sick uneducated puppy now. In addition, your description of the Q&A is far from exact. It was a Q&A and not a chat room, as you tried very hard to convert it to, unsuccessfully. Check out how many have been banned from Dave's blog and then try to tell me and the other people of the village that I had iron fisted control of a fascist regime. Who's the one who doesn't allow freedom of speech as you and he always accused me of? In addition to me being called a Nazi on the Q&A, and telling me I should be in Hitler's Army, I was constantly accused by you, Dave and Lily Roberts, among a few others of David's supporters of many other things, including being homophobic.........all untrue. I have worked with the public all of my life, and anyone who knows me even a little, knows I am very far removed from any of the things you and the rest of Dave's cohorts accused me of. Also compare the number of people who post on Dave's blog, to the number who used to post on the Q&A. There is absolutely no comparison. You and the other dissidents, yes I said dissidents, who were banned from the Q&A were upset that UCO officers didn't post on the Q&A. They were not ever required to post there, but you didn't like that, because you couldn't get into an online war with them. Go crawl back into your hole. Nobody else could fit.............it's too small.
ReplyDeleteHi Frau , Nice to see you are still espousing the party line. : )
DeleteMike,The Party line here is Civility and add to the conversation. You want to make your own mark. Get your own Blog
DeleteChou En Lia
Gary, You consider this Blog civil discourse? Amazing! : : )
Delete